showcase GPT domains

[Centauri]

Hey,

now that GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) is so hyped,
and news GPT .com sold for over $40k,
chatgpt.com valued at $29 bio. recently,

its maybe time to have a small but dedicated thread for GPT.


Do you own any names?

 

[bmugford]

I really look forward to the outcome of the Chatgpt.com UDRP, whoever regged it could see a huge lottery ticket payday or the administrative fleecing of a $M+ domain.

UDRP is just low hanging fruit.

If they lose the UDRP they are likely to just take it to an actual court.

You can argue about "GPT" all you want, but "ChatGPT" is a much different story.

Brad

 

[Omega Assets]

@bmugford You know what is funny, you argue a lot about trademarks etc. but did you know that "DataCube" is trademarked heavily? I'm sure you do. I still remember you saying you would sell it. I guess we all should just develop our GPT domains then for something unrelated to AI etc. and just wait for a nice buyer to come along lol in fact 13 registered TMs for DataCube.

 

[bmugford]

@bmugford You know what is funny, you argue a lot about trademarks etc. but did you know that "DataCube" is trademarked heavily? I'm sure you do. I still remember you saying you would sell it. I guess we all should just develop our GPT domains then for something unrelated to AI etc. and just wait for a nice buyer to come along lol in fact 13 registered TMs for DataCube.

Show attachment 237079

The pending "GPT" trademark is for the specific use in the AI field.

Other uses for "GPT" would be irrelevant, just like your post is.

OpenAi would obviously have no claim if you were using the term for "Georgia Physical Therapy".

Brad

 

[Hitbones]

GPTOPT.com

 

[Omega Assets]

The pending "GPT" trademark is for the specific use in the AI field.

Other uses for "GPT" would be irrelevant, just like your post is.

OpenAi would obviously have no claim if you were using the term for "Georgia Physical Therapy".

Brad

Nope, it is very relevant, it is kinda hypocritical telling people indirectly not to register GPT domains, because of TM issues, while you yourself do it with DataCube.

 

[bmugford]

I guess we all should just develop our GPT domains then for something unrelated to AI etc. and just wait for a nice buyer to come along lol in fact 13 registered TMs for DataCube.

You got me dude. I have only been using the domain in commerce for like 14 years in order to sell the domain.

Nope, it is very relevant, it is kinda hypocritical telling people indirectly not to register GPT domains, because of TM issues, while you yourself do it with DataCube.

I won't hold it against you that you don't know what you are talking about.

"Data Cube" is a generic term in computing BTW. Feel free to Google it.

Cheers.

Brad

 

[Omega Assets]

I won't hold it against you that you don't know what you are talking about.

Cheers.

Brad

Cheers,

Reset (huge ego)

 

[ARCCLOUD]

Welp, just added two more:

docreviewgpt.com
documentreviewgpt.com

I have ChatGPT review documents now as another set of eyes as im sure many others do. Worth the reg fee for the small gamble imho.

 

[bmugford]

Nope, it is very relevant, it is kinda hypocritical telling people indirectly not to register GPT domains, because of TM issues...

People can invest in what they want to invest in. It's their money.
I wish everyone success.

The fact OpenAI is already sending C&D for the term just creates confusion and uncertainty.

It would be nice if OpenAI came out and made some definitive statement on the subject.

Brad

 

[silentg]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1654257365741436928

 

[bmugford]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1654257365741436928

I think it is debatable, but set that aside for a second.

Sometimes the merits of a case don't matter as much as who is making the claim and how much money they have.

I have ran into plenty of companies making unreasonable claims over the years, for instance "Edible Arrangements" for the term "Edible" in a broad manner.

That is why some definitive statement from OpenAi on their view of "GPT" would be nice.

Brad

 

[karmaco]

Yet, they filed as Bloomberg GPT, when the Bloomberg portion is already trademark.
This would be a redundant filing if it was just about the "Bloomberg" portion of the mark.

Like many other companies filing Term+GPT filings, the "GPT" is relevant to their IP ventures.

Hence, the growing number of term+GPT filings.

Open AI's filing is Feb 2023, the timeline for approvals is longer than ever. Every day that passes by, more corporations file similar marks and these corps will submit many oppositions to the Trademark Office.

Genericness is a key element to trademark approval and maintenance. A TM can be too generic for protection, or become too generic to maintain prior protection.

I'm betting by the time ChatGPT mark reaches opposition, it'll be too generic to receive anything but the narrowest protection related to OpenAI.

The in usage date is stated and was allowed to be stated (and proven) as 2018. The filing date means nothing.

I don’t know what will happen but I just see alot of domainers defensively pissed because they bought GPT names.

When something becomes an overnight sensation and widely recognized the claim is even stronger. We night not be lawyers but you don’t even seem to understand the basics.

 

[Grablink]

mathgpt.com sold for 10k usd. Not my sale.

 

[matemp]

"GPT" as an abbreviation for generative pretrained transformer is really not distinctive to OpenAI, IMO...it's a description of the type of language model they use. It's very unlikely the USPTO will approve that application, IMO.

I don't have the ability to post a link on this site, but there's a good article at Lexology.com about it, from 4/26/23...

(However, I do think OpenAI should get their trademark registration approved for "ChatGPT" -- because that is distinctive how they combined part of the word "chatbot" with the technical term GPT.)

 

[matemp]

Generally trademark law is specific to a given context/field of use, so a given word being used in other fields isn't really an issue...unless it's deemed a "famous" mark, which is another matter (but in that case it can be restricted somewhat more broadly).

 

[drk_78]

GPTSlate.com

similar to "CryptoSlate.com" can be a name associated with a website or platform focused on providing news and information related to the field of artificial intelligence, particularly with regard to GPT technology.

The name "Slate" could again suggest that the website is a comprehensive source of information, covering all aspects of GPT technology, including its uses, applications, and implications.

 

[Hitbones]

SovaGPT.com

 

[Backrow]

Casual domain trader. Casual reader of NP. First time poster as I thought this may be of interest.

From the Twitter thread of davidmichaels on 5 May (since I can't post links and just link to it):

"If you are a domain name investor or an OpenAI subscriber, Let me know if you are interested in filing a class action lawsuit against OpenAI and BrandShield."

"Brandshield's letters to users of domains comprising the word GPT have devalued the resale value of GPT domain names. That devaluation represents damages that owners of these domains have sustained. Damages under the Lanham Act and the Sherman Act are also available."

 

[Centauri]

Casual domain trader. Casual reader of NP. First time poster as I thought this may be of interest.

From the Twitter thread of davidmichaels on 5 May (since I can't post links and just link to it):

"If you are a domain name investor or an OpenAI subscriber, Let me know if you are interested in filing a class action lawsuit against OpenAI and BrandShield."

"Brandshield's letters to users of domains comprising the word GPT have devalued the resale value of GPT domain names. That devaluation represents damages that owners of these domains have sustained. Damages under the Lanham Act and the Sherman Act are also available."

Thanks for letting us all know!

 

[ARCCLOUD]

Picked up
cloudmining(GPT).com
taxhelp(GPT).com
(GPT)taxhelp.com
clearing(GPT).com
carauction(GPT).com
ereader(GPT).com
(GPT)ereader.com

 

[drk_78]

Domain name that suggests an AI-powered pad device for professionals for the future of productivity and efficiency in the workplace.

 

[Arjun Oli]

 

[drk_78]

 

[Centauri]

Just for everyone, who may have missed it on the previous page:

Casual domain trader. Casual reader of NP. First time poster as I thought this may be of interest.

From the Twitter thread of davidmichaels on 5 May (since I can't post links and just link to it):

"If you are a domain name investor or an OpenAI subscriber, Let me know if you are interested in filing a class action lawsuit against OpenAI and BrandShield."

"Brandshield's letters to users of domains comprising the word GPT have devalued the resale value of GPT domain names. That devaluation represents damages that owners of these domains have sustained. Damages under the Lanham Act and the Sherman Act are also available."

 

[drk_78]