More
here...
But as you mentioned was not the case with GetMy...
There are over 1,000 .coms regged beginning with 'GetMy'. In this case, my is acting as a
possessive adjective to describe ownership of the following noun.
Take GetMyScore for example.
Show attachment 134959
There are 250+ .coms regged starting with Get, and containing score. Of that, the doubled hyphenated Get-Your-Score .com is included. The Your following Get also acts as a possessive adjective, thus over 1,000 .com's are regged beginning with GetYour.
Show attachment 134961
As such, GetMy and GetYour are very similar in nature in that Action + Possessive Adjective + [insert anything here]
What do I want to get? I want to
get my ________.
Hey, you won! Go
get your _________.
Opposed to less descriptive Get domains without possessive adjective, such as GetScore. While GetScore is short, and works well as a brand, grammatically there is room to ask what score was received, as it lacks descriptiveness? What score, the Dallas Cowboys score? GetScore would have a likely use as a credit score service, thus GetMyScore or GetYourScore would be descriptive fits because it narrows down the score to pertaining to ones self. To conclude, GetMy is generic, and customizable enough for just about anything pertaining.
Regards to GetNext, I see Next in this context as
the next big thing, but that's just personal opinion not even supported by the registration of GetTheNextBigThing.com which has been sitting unregged since 2007. Next in general is a huge keyword, as it comes after now. Now is cool, but what happens next?
I'd imagine getNEXT would be interested in upgrading to Next.com, (
redirects to Apple) but who knows what the asking price of that domain is, which was probably included in the $429mil purchase price of the neXT in 1997. I mean, when a company capitalizes the primary keyword in their name, doesn't that reflect interest in upgrading to the shorter one-word domain?
Show attachment 134964
Then, there are longer [Get + adjectives] that are more fitting than their shorter [Get + Verb] such as GetInsure.com VS GetInsured.com
Show attachment 134966
Show attachment 134969
VS
Show attachment 134971
Because Get Insured is self explanatory, I'm not so sure they'd be nearly as interested in rebranding to Insured.com as getNEXT would be in re-branding to Next.com.