- Impact
- 402
Hello what do you guys think about domain name prefix e and i? Which one is better e or i?
I have a couple e prefix dictionary words and general consensus seems to be e.
As an aside, I happen to think that single letter prefix/suffix dictionary words- where the prefix/suffix letter doesn't impact the pronunciation of the word- offer immense current value. like, officej.com or mrentals.com or qconcrete.com or patiosx.com, etc. There are just too many hard hitting, creative uses for these given the prices they currently bring and their relationship to the value of the analog pure .com. I can absolutely foresee future SERP algo advantages in them. My money is where my mouth is- about 10% of my portfolio is in such names.
There is no standard first choice. It just comes down to which one sounds better.
e = electronic
i = internet
But i also has the "I am/me/my/mine" personal angle going for it if that means something to the keyword.
I just registered e-readersshop.com
:? I believe the only ones kicking themselves will be the ones who bought them!! Please explain how 'chairsW' will have any more value, relevance, brand ability, or memorability than 'chairsF', 'chairsQ', chairs3, etc.! Are people supposed to go thru the suffix alphabet to find a site for a keywordSUFFIX?? And if SEO placement is your answer, names like FranksChairs are just as SEO applicable, and more memorable! i, e, m, even v, prefixes are more accepted due to their connotations and early adaptations, but they only have marginal value, and are not as 'hot' as they 'were'!! But the 'any' suffix thing, just brings too much confusion to the average surfer. The only purpose I see, is for those hoping to make a few pennies off typo searches. Sorry, but IMO, these types of regs are desperate keyword regs that only benefit registrars. Go thru the drops, they are filled with these 'misspells'!!I just bought iran(letter-suffix).com - something like IranW.com
IMO, these single letter variety prefixes (which I usually prefer, but in some cases I will take suffixes)) are just ridiculously good values in the year 2009. Obviously, there is only one keyword.com. There are only two "standard" prefixes- E and I, so ekeyword and ikeyword.com....
IMO, In 10 years, people will look back on the days when they could get single letter prefix/suffix domains like "chairsw.com" or "rtables.com" for closeout prices and kick themselves for not buying. Of course, not that I care if they do or not. More for me
:? I believe the only ones kicking themselves will be the ones who bought them!! Please explain how 'chairsW' will have any more value, relevance, brand ability, or memorability than 'chairsF', 'chairsQ', chairs3, etc.! Are people supposed to go thru the suffix alphabet to find a site for a keywordSUFFIX??
i, e, m, even v, prefixes are more accepted due to their connotations and early adaptations, but they only have marginal value, and are not as 'hot' as they 'were'!!
The only purpose I see, is for those hoping to make a few pennies off typo searches. Sorry, but IMO, these types of regs are desperate keyword regs that only benefit registrars. Go thru the drops, they are filled with these 'misspells'!!
Understandable.I swear to god, I heard a gong go off when I finished reading your post.
Can't find that word in the English dictionary.Try to appreciate the precpets of creativity
So PizzaC isn't 'piz zac'?I don't know what the "suffix alphabet" is- I'm pretty sure it's the same thing as the good old fashioned English language alphabet, given that in the context of this discussion, any letter can be a relevant suffix so long as it doesn't interfere with the pronunciation of the word,
Well, let's see, it means Pizza CHEEZE? or Pizza CINCINNATTI? or Pizza CHEAP?, or again.. - Piz Zac?and the suffix in question can be branded with any word that happens to begin with that letter.
For example, if I live in the famous pizza town of Chicago and I own "PizzaC.com", do you really- SERIOUSLY- struggle to see the generic brandability value in that? Honestly?
I was discussing 'suffixs'. And what we did have in i-e's, are long gone now.Please inform of all premium keywords you have with e, V or I prefixes and let me know how "cheap" you're willing to sell them for.
??? I realize you may not be up on this yet, but 'm' is for mobile, and as some are real keyed up on 'm dots' for mobile sites, I, and others, can see not only 'm' coming into play, but because it could be a typo of an 'm dot' site, perhaps even desirable for those who have those names for 'brand protection'.I'm perfectly willing to put my money where my mouth is. As far as the "M" prefix, I really don't know of anything special with that, other than you seem to own a few of them and might not want to appear to be making an argument against something you yourself seem to be invested in.
Of course not. Yet look up any 'keywordSUFFIX' name, insuranceG., LoansQ. etc, and 95%, or more, of them are only parked pages, not 'developed' sites.It has absolutely nothing to do with "typos".
Understandable.
Can't find that word in the English dictionary.
So PizzaC isn't 'piz zac'?
Well, let's see, it means Pizza CHEEZE? or Pizza CINCINNATTI? or Pizza CHEAP?, or again.. - Piz Zac?
??? I realize you may not be up on this yet, but 'm' is for mobile, and as some are real keyed up on 'm dots' for mobile sites, I, and others, can see not only 'm' coming into play, but because it could be a typo of an 'm dot' site, perhaps even desirable for those who have those names for 'brand protection'.
Of course not. Yet look up any 'keywordSUFFIX' name, insuranceG., LoansQ. etc, and 95%, or more, of them are only parked pages, not 'developed' sites.
And I'll probably get more for my eAutoLoans.com than you would for your PizzaC or ChairsW. But... then, maybe not. ..maybe not!
Hello what do you guys think about domain name prefix e and i? Which one is better e or i?
I just bought iran(letter-suffix).com - something like IranW.com
IMO, these single letter variety prefixes (which I usually prefer, but in some cases I will take suffixes)) are just ridiculously good values in the year 2009. Obviously, there is only one keyword.com. There are only two "standard" prefixes- E and I, so ekeyword and ikeyword.com.
That leaves a remaining 24 letter prefixes in the whole wide world for any given pure keyword.
Some of them cause a disruption with the flow of pronunciation (for example, goranges.com or pireland.com) meaning that the remaining letter prefix/suffix domains that don't (OrangesB.com or xireland.com) leave a hugely open ended dev possibility for very cheap with a near bullseye keyword .com.
IMO, In 10 years, people will look back on the days when they could get single letter prefix/suffix domains like "chairsw.com" or "rtables.com" for closeout prices and kick themselves for not buying. Of course, not that I care if they do or not. More for me :D :D :D