Yong1
Established Member
- Impact
- 53
During an EAP (early pre-registration) it is not customary and is not good practice to allow multiple pre-registrations for the same domain within a Registrar.
I found this quite disturbing!
Registrar is misleading by allowing multiple pre-registrations in -new gtlds prior to general availability.
It is not right to do so since in any event only the one who registered first within the Registrars system (if they indeed get the name during that eap) is and should be entitled to that domain.
If there is a name in pre-order or in EAP by a company, then there should either be a notice that someone else already pre-registered it within their system - cautioning the person about it.
Or not have the name available by them for registration again once it was pre-registered by someone in their system.
Otherwise it is very misleading. They could just take many orders for the same name endless times!! and then just delegate to whomever they want!
If I know that someone or more than one are there in line before me, I wouldnt place an order and pay for it, at that stage.
By having multiple applications there is also no transparency, as the registrar could just decide to give it to whomever they close a deal with!
There has to be transparency.
If you do not inform people that there is another order in your system prior to their order, you are basically misleading them. It is simple as that.
I found this quite disturbing!
Registrar is misleading by allowing multiple pre-registrations in -new gtlds prior to general availability.
It is not right to do so since in any event only the one who registered first within the Registrars system (if they indeed get the name during that eap) is and should be entitled to that domain.
If there is a name in pre-order or in EAP by a company, then there should either be a notice that someone else already pre-registered it within their system - cautioning the person about it.
Or not have the name available by them for registration again once it was pre-registered by someone in their system.
Otherwise it is very misleading. They could just take many orders for the same name endless times!! and then just delegate to whomever they want!
If I know that someone or more than one are there in line before me, I wouldnt place an order and pay for it, at that stage.
By having multiple applications there is also no transparency, as the registrar could just decide to give it to whomever they close a deal with!
There has to be transparency.
If you do not inform people that there is another order in your system prior to their order, you are basically misleading them. It is simple as that.