Being fair to epik...
Is
this accurate? How come that blog entry to wikipedia wasn't scrutinized? Has anybody trying to edit epik's article mentioned the domain not being registered at epik anymore? Or is everybody trying to edit epiks wikipedia page busy battling each other?
I'm not too well versed in the history behind:
When I google searched (maybe not the correct term) "epik.com sells drugs"
The first related article was from an apparent pahaceutical watchdog website LegalScript. Curious, has LegalScript /blog been deemed such an authoritative website to disregard traditional legal processes?
The article mentions ONE domain. Really, just one domain? A domain that is no longer registered with Epik. Apparently the domain that warranted the wikipedia entry was, onlinedrugpills.net.
http://web.archive.org/web/20180922131117/http://www.onlinedrugpills.net/
The author (Michal) has 7 posts on LegalScript.
https://www.legitscript.com/blog/author/michal/
I haven't read them, but my first question, would be about her background, or the research process. To get an understanding how well versed regarding domain names the author is. Not to make it about the author. I'm more curious about the process(es) that were taken. And what made the blog entry qualify to be included as a wikipedia source.