IT.COM

A lack of creativity in domain name creation?

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

Adrigan

Established Member
Impact
24
It seems to me that there is a lack of creativity in domain name creation.

I sense that there is a fixation/obsession with keywords so that the domain will appeal to Google, a private company that is an effective monopoly and seems to do whatever it likes. Remember when Google were upstarts and said “Don’t be evil” - well, they have become what they once despised.
This happens with many challengers to the status quo, in that once they begin to grow, they can soon become the status quo and act in ways that they used to criticize/despise others. Apple is another such company, and as much as I like their products (except their poor Mail program), approaching $3 trillion in revenue hampers your ability to being a challenger, an innovator, fresh.
Perhaps if Steve and Jony were still there, Apple could still have those attributes.

But I digress.

I haven’t ever focused on creating domains based on keywords. It just seems that the keyword space is so overcrowded that getting noticed becomes harder and harder over time. I also don’t really understand this space, having not explored it and I also take exception to being at the mercy of the evil G, who behave as judge, jury & executioner, to say the least of their antics.

Looking at the some of the recently created internet companies (last 15 years or so), there are many two word company names made up of dictionary words, but a good number are names that are not real words and their names are just made up.
This is the area I have focused on for the past 10+ years and I have been surprised at how many names have been available that I have come up with. Over the last few years, I have added over 200 names to my portfolio and I am coming up with name ideas all the time. Although not all my name ideas become names I register.

I don’t expect many of my names to appeal to lots of people or that they will sell for eyebrow raising amounts. But like all seller/buyer scenarios, it only takes one person to like a name I have created and like it enough to want to buy it. Given the population of internet users, which is always growing and that useful domain names are becoming increasingly rarer, I think that won’t be hard to achieve.

I usually come up with names by something I see or hear, sometimes swapping letters around or adding 1-2 letters, sometimes replacing letters. I have also “discovered” names, serendipitously, by making typos when I’ve been typing something, like an email or a url. It is surprising to me how often this happens and I am stopped in my working flow. I pause for a while and think about what is on the screen. Sometimes, its nothing or really just junk, but sometimes it looks and sounds great to me.

Usually, I need to like how the domain sounds and if it passes the “radio test”. I also have to be able to see what market the name might address or appeal to and whether that market is immature/mature and/or overcrowded and/or populated by upstarts. Domain names are very low cost, but if you register many iffy names or names with fringe appeal, the costs add up.
I check the visitor figures for each of my domains as they are coming up for renewal and take a decision on whether to renew or let them expire. I don’t let many go.

I tend to focus on 5-8 letter domains (4 letter domains are almost all taken up, the worthwhile ones that is, but I don’t spend any time searching just for these), but I might go beyond 8 letters if the name sounds very good to me.

I do have some domains that are real words, including people’s names, but this is less than 5% of my portfolio.

If you have approached domain name creation in ways other than by using keywords, perhaps you’d like to share your method or comment on mine.
 
5
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
It's important to understand that this is a forum of resellers, not end-users.

We're interested in domains that consistently sell, and the domains that consistently sell are the generic ones, the ones that a lot of people "come up with" when they brainstorm ideas for brands.

As good as something like Axorin could be (short and legible), no one is going to think of it. In fact you can replace the "o" with an "i" and the domain is still going to be unregistered. Because people don't think of these names.

1711348930722.png

1711349186048.png
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Imo... Businesses lack creativity in coming up with a brand to set them apart. They all want a keyword, then slap whatever fits their niche next to it to get their domain.

So its not just domainers being lazy, they're just following the money.

That being said, OP is kinda right. I am always on the lookout for unconventional names, they make great brands and will sell if you get your expectations right.

May not be millions but mid $xxx is kinda ok on a hand reg.
 
4
•••
Imo... Businesses lack creativity in coming up with a brand to set them apart. They all want a keyword, then slap whatever fits their niche next to it to get their domain.

So its not just domainers being lazy, they're just following the money.

That being said, OP is kinda right. I am always on the lookout for unconventional names, they make great brands and will sell if you get your expectations right.

May not be millions but mid $xxx is kinda ok on a hand reg.
Kinda of a catch 22, though... If it's a great brand name, it should already be in use by several companies, in which case it's unlikely to be available as a hand reg. If it's available, it's usually because no one has thought (or wanted) to use the name... which makes it a lot harder to sell.

Mid $XXX may seem good on a $12 investment, but when you consider that good domain portfolios sell about 1-2% of their names per year on average, you actually need to be aiming for a $1,000 sale on hand reg names in order to at least break even in the long run.
 
6
•••
Imo... Businesses lack creativity in coming up with a brand to set them apart. They all want a keyword, then slap whatever fits their niche next to it to get their domain.
Indeed, But quite often these businesses are flexible with their Keyword, providing it fits within their category rather than specific niche. This gives the creative quite a bit of leeway in bringing a bit of word-art to the table.

Making sure it shows-up within their keyword searches on the sales sites is key to getting it noticed in the first place
 
Last edited:
3
•••
May not be millions but mid $xxx is kinda ok on a hand reg.

The math does not work out if you hand reg at $10 and sell for $500 @ 1-2%.

You'll breakeven at best and more likely lose money.

"Creativity" and "making money as a domain investor" rarely go hand in hand.

There are exceptions such as Sten who have a knack for coming up with names that will sell. But most people don't have this skillset. Just look at all the names for sale here on the forum. 99% are complete garbage.

Focus on keywords that business owners consistently use to name their businesses and you will do well.
 
4
•••
The math does not work out if you hand reg at $10 and sell for $500 @ 1-2%.

You'll breakeven at best and more likely lose money.

"Creativity" and "making money as a domain investor" rarely go hand in hand.

There are exceptions such as Sten who have a knack for coming up with names that will sell. But most people don't have this skillset. Just look at all the names for sale here on the forum. 99% are complete garbage.

Focus on keywords that business owners consistently use to name their businesses and you will do well.

That's why you gotta work on your STR. You can either sell little with a high margin and low STR or sell a lot with a small margin and very high STR. Both solid business strategies.

I like a mix of both.
 
0
•••
Kinda of a catch 22, though... If it's a great brand name, it should already be in use by several companies, in which case it's unlikely to be available as a hand reg. If it's available, it's usually because no one has thought (or wanted) to use the name... which makes it a lot harder to sell.

Mid $XXX may seem good on a $12 investment, but when you consider that good domain portfolios sell about 1-2% of their names per year on average, you actually need to be aiming for a $1,000 sale on hand reg names in order to at least break even in the long run.

"Great" can be quite subjective. Gotta look for "decent" or "ok" names and market them as being just that and keep your STR up.

It takes time, it takes effort though.

Gotta balance out your portfolio as well. Good mix of liquids, oneworders. Com net org and matured cctlds.

Regarding the STR... Lower tier portfolios definitely need a much higher STR than that 1-2%, if you've got the skills to pull it off.

Just saying, don't get fooled by what people sell domains for, look at the bottom line. If you net 100K a year and are able to repeat that , it doesn't matter what you sell, how many you sell. Profit is what's counting.

That being said, I do agree with you but for those lacking funds to invest in top dollar names, there's another path to walk if you take the time to study, watch and educate yourself. Get creative.
 
5
•••
All of the following domains have MarkMonitor nameservers.

Which of these domains are considered "creative"?

Which not?

Why?

AirDog.com
BigTea.com
CarFox.com
DotFox.com
DuoSet.com
ELoans.com
EVChat.com
EcoLab.com
EpiBio.com
FoxApp.com
FoxJet.com
GenApp.com
GeneGo.com
GoRent.com
HRPost.com
ICheck.com
KeyDNA.com
LabFly.com
LawKey.com
LoveTV.com
MAudio.com
MapleX.com
MeatMe.com
MyBook.com
MyMint.com
MyWave.com
NewPig.com
OneTax.com
PayPay.com
PrimeX.com
ReGrow.com
SexFit.com
ShareX.com
SunEra.com
TaxNet.com
TaxPay.com
ToyFun.com
UpNext.com
VGames.com
WeCash.com
WeShow.com
WinNow.com
YourXL.com

AIMedia.com
AirSure.com
AirWalk.com
AirWork.com
AllTour.com
AppMaps.com
AppPack.com
BabySum.com
BaySide.com
BetCast.com
BetaLab.com
BioBeat.com
BuyDocs.com
CarShow.com
CareBay.com
CellOne.com
DNSFirm.com
DayAuto.com
DayDots.com
DayPost.com
DealBay.com
DevDeal.com
DogFood.com
DotPack.com
DotSpot.com
DuoFast.com
ECrafts.com
EastLaw.com
EasyAir.com
EasyApe.com
EasyArt.com
EasyFly.com
EasyGym.com
EasyHub.com
EcoLabs.com
EcoSure.com
EpiLife.com
EuroCar.com
EuroPay.com
FilmPix.com
FinBank.com
FineLaw.com
FireMap.com
FlyCast.com
FoxKids.com
FoxLife.com
FoxPlay.com
FoxPlus.com
GenGirl.com
GenLine.com
GeneSea.com
GetSpin.com
GymKids.com
GymMail.com
HelpKey.com
HelpNet.com
HelpNow.com
HomeOwl.com
JetPlan.com
JobMesh.com
LabDrop.com
LabGold.com
LawNews.com
LifeMap.com
LiveFin.com
MPortal.com
MapTour.com
MedCars.com
MediSys.com
MindBio.com
MyScene.com
NFTFeed.com
NameCop.com
NanoLux.com
NeoWare.com
NetBook.com
NextApe.com
OurNews.com
OutTime.com
PayFlow.com
PetExpo.com
PetPath.com
PinkDog.com
PopBets.com
ProReal.com
ProTeam.com
RealBay.com
SeaPlay.com
SiteNow.com
SkiExpo.com
SkiTrip.com
SkiWear.com
SkySale.com
SoftMax.com
SunFace.com
SunFire.com
TalkNow.com
TaxEdge.com
TaxLife.com
TeleBay.com
TheFlip.com
TimeBio.com
TimePix.com
ToyShow.com
TrustIQ.com
UpCycle.com
UpWorks.com
VAction.com
VSecret.com
VitaJoy.com
WebCast.com
WebChat.com
WinGuru.com
WinTrip.com
WokInfo.com
WordDNA.com
WorkMap.com

AgileTax.com
AgriCard.com
AirTruth.com
AllBirds.com
AllGenes.com
AppCloud.com
AppStorm.com
BackDocs.com
BasePack.com
BattleTV.com
BetSmart.com
BetaFund.com
BikeBarn.com
BikeLine.com
BioMatic.com
BioWorld.com
BodyBlue.com
BodyShop.com
BoldLook.com
BuySight.com
ChatHelp.com
CheapFly.com
CitySeek.com
ClickTax.com
CodeGear.com
CodeGirl.com
ColorPro.com
CoolTown.com
CoolTrip.com
CoreCell.com
CropInfo.com
DNAStory.com
DailyHub.com
DairyDNA.com
DealTime.com
DevWorld.com
DocTimes.com
DogMovie.com
DriveWay.com
ECompany.com
EagleOne.com
EasyBags.com
EasyBank.com
EasyCars.com
EasyGold.com
EasyJobs.com
EmailPay.com
EtherBay.com
EvoLogic.com
FaceSpot.com
FairLoan.com
FairMail.com
FarmGear.com
FireRush.com
FixForce.com
FlowBank.com
FlowLook.com
FluxMesh.com
FoxWorld.com
FullMore.com
GameDrop.com
GearView.com
GiftHive.com
GoCourse.com
GoldCard.com
GoldSwan.com
GovCrush.com
GreyLock.com
HRCoding.com
HelloSum.com
HeyLight.com
HorseApp.com
HorseDNA.com
HydraAir.com
IVenture.com
IconPlus.com
InnoBook.com
InnoSure.com
InterMix.com
JobForce.com
JoyMaker.com
JuiceBox.com
LearnFit.com
LifeTech.com
LiveDots.com
LottoMax.com
LunaHelp.com
LunaSite.com
MCuisine.com
MailBear.com
MailKing.com
MailRank.com
MainSpot.com
MealDash.com
MedSmart.com
MediWell.com
MegaCars.com
MetaText.com
MintGift.com
MintLoan.com
MoneyNet.com
NameCops.com
NetSweet.com
NewScore.com
NewStorm.com
NewsCore.com
OpenRide.com
OpenTube.com
OurSpace.com
PayFirst.com
PetVille.com
PinkGlow.com
PlaySpot.com
PokerPay.com
PowerTax.com
ProClear.com
ProQuest.com
RawColor.com
ReEscrow.com
RockDrop.com
RockPort.com
SEOAlert.com
SafeSpot.com
SeaPilot.com
SeaScout.com
SearchHR.com
ShareBox.com
ShoeSite.com
SnapSpot.com
SnapTime.com
SoloSite.com
SunLotto.com
SwiftTax.com
TastyLab.com
TaxClick.com
TaxTalks.com
TaxVault.com
TaxWorks.com
TeaIndia.com
TechFeed.com
TeleShow.com
TheDaily.com
TheFight.com
TheStory.com
TimeLife.com
ToolMind.com
ToyMaker.com
TrueFirm.com
TrueHome.com
TwinLion.com
VAmerica.com
VCommand.com
VidaFeed.com
WeFamily.com
WeReview.com
WebBlock.com
WestHome.com
WestMail.com
WestNews.com
WinGuard.com
WinMania.com
WordWise.com
WorkDocs.com
WorkPlus.com
YogaGlow.com
YourDiet.com
 
Last edited:
9
•••
"Great" can be quite subjective. Gotta look for "decent" or "ok" names and market them as being just that and keep your STR up.

It takes time, it takes effort though.

Gotta balance out your portfolio as well. Good mix of liquids, oneworders. Com net org and matured cctlds.

Regarding the STR... Lower tier portfolios definitely need a much higher STR than that 1-2%, if you've got the skills to pull it off.

Just saying, don't get fooled by what people sell domains for, look at the bottom line. If you net 100K a year and are able to repeat that , it doesn't matter what you sell, how many you sell. Profit is what's counting.

That being said, I do agree with you but for those lacking funds to invest in top dollar names, there's another path to walk if you take the time to study, watch and educate yourself. Get creative.
You're quite right. If you find a system that works, stick with it.

The extra work and skills involved in marketing lower quality names (for a higher STR) might appeal to some. I just prefer putting in less effort to make the same amount. :)
 
0
•••
You're quite right. If you find a system that works, stick with it.

The extra work and skills involved in marketing lower quality names (for a higher STR) might appeal to some. I just prefer putting in less effort to make the same amount. :)

I agree, lol. Most business is concluded while taking a bathroom break tbh :)

But yes, you're right. Time spend is something to take into consideration. Acquiring a top tier domain below market value takes a lot of time as well though, not to be underestimated.

Bluntly put, there are no shortcuts to take. Read, read,read... Then read some more and learn from those who preceded you, whatever your preferred approach to domaining is.
 
1
•••
All of the following domains have MarkMonitor nameservers.

Which of these domains are considered "creative"?
Wow, that is some list and it would take a hell of a lot of time to break it down by my own criteria. After a quick view and a few stops along the way, I would estimate that around 90% could be considered 'Creative' by wording, many will be border-line. (that doesn't mean I consider all of them to be Good)

Creative to my mind equals Not specifically designed or worded to Pigeon-hole its use. Therefore it's capable of multiple interpretations within boundaries. However, It should stand the test of being assigned a Specific interpretation when in use./active business/live website.

This is just a short answer, I will need to give you examples which would help define. Hopefully I'll find some time later to give you a better interpretation. There remains a big gulf between good and poor creativity.
 
Last edited:
4
•••
0
•••
0
•••
I was thinking about registering e-casinowalletinsurance.com or nftblockcrypto.ai . Please evaluate.
 
0
•••
2
•••
You are right, the world is not black and not white, it is gray. 99% of people are also a gray mass. They need to eat well, sleep well, have great sex and earn a lot of money. Many of my colleagues here said wise words: if you are ready to lose money, you can experiment with creativity. The moral here is simple - now you are at domainer forum, where the laws of activity are simple - buy cheaper, sell more expensive. This is also science. You need to know what exactly to buy. Need Knowledge and Experience. You offer a creative approach. And I welcome it. Because I myself do it. I like to inhale the life into dead verbal constructions. When I was just a start of domaining I sincerely did not understand why interesting word structures were not interested in anyone. For example Keen+Insurance=KeensuranceLLLL, Aroma+Mango=AromangoLLLL, Olymp+Empire=OlympireLLLL(was sold for $2,549, you may visit this site to see new brand, that never was before), It was a very exciting activity, since I created the unique names of brands from scratch, but this play of words does not bring much money. The maximum I received $ 3300 (but I did not fall less than $ 2000). This is also a good result, given that I have spent no more than $10 for registration. But I need to move on. Therefore, I began to buy LLLL.com domains to improve my portfolio. I didn't want to do this. This iwas necessary. Imagine you walk along the street; On the left is a large supermarket, and a small shop on the right. To buy home products, you will choose a supermarket where there is a large selection. Your portfolio should become such a supermarket of high -quality domains for all occasions. You need to combine your creativity and trading experience.
 
Last edited:
3
•••
One does not simply trademark descriptive 'keyword' domains. Trademarks cannot be descriptive.

But trademarks are important in corporate warfare. Creates a defensible moat. So you look for catchy, short, trademark-able names. Maybe, made-up. Maybe, portmanteau. Maybe single letters!

Short, catchy names like X.com describe nothing and yet once you hear it you won't forget it. BUT short catchy names are fraught with fire swamps. Your brilliant idea has already been done. A lot. You need Musk level $$ to fight your way out. According to National Law Review, X.com was hit last year with the inevitable infringement suit. No idea how that turned out but X.com is still running so ...

Which brings us back to non trademark-able descriptive keyword domains. They are safe. They won't violate anyone's trademark. They are blue collar work horses. Folks can find you, no problem.

A good strategy for us peasants is to start our business on a low cost descriptive domain and gradually switch to a more 'spensive branded name as you get your money wheels and advertising going.

Maybe Musk should have gone with the drab sounding, beige colored ... SocialMedia.com

Both types of domains are needed. Trademark-able names have a much smaller market.
 
3
•••
All of the following domains have MarkMonitor nameservers.

Which of these domains are considered "creative"?

Which not?

Why?

AirDog.com
BigTea.com
CarFox.com
DotFox.com
DuoSet.com
ELoans.com
EVChat.com
EcoLab.com
EpiBio.com
FoxApp.com
FoxJet.com
GenApp.com
GeneGo.com
GoRent.com
HRPost.com
ICheck.com
KeyDNA.com
LabFly.com
LawKey.com
LoveTV.com
MAudio.com
MapleX.com
MeatMe.com
MyBook.com
MyMint.com
MyWave.com
NewPig.com
OneTax.com
PayPay.com
PrimeX.com
ReGrow.com
SexFit.com
ShareX.com
SunEra.com
TaxNet.com
TaxPay.com
ToyFun.com
UpNext.com
VGames.com
WeCash.com
WeShow.com
WinNow.com
YourXL.com

AIMedia.com
AirSure.com
AirWalk.com
AirWork.com
AllTour.com
AppMaps.com
AppPack.com
BabySum.com
BaySide.com
BetCast.com
BetaLab.com
BioBeat.com
BuyDocs.com
CarShow.com
CareBay.com
CellOne.com
DNSFirm.com
DayAuto.com
DayDots.com
DayPost.com
DealBay.com
DevDeal.com
DogFood.com
DotPack.com
DotSpot.com
DuoFast.com
ECrafts.com
EastLaw.com
EasyAir.com
EasyApe.com
EasyArt.com
EasyFly.com
EasyGym.com
EasyHub.com
EcoLabs.com
EcoSure.com
EpiLife.com
EuroCar.com
EuroPay.com
FilmPix.com
FinBank.com
FineLaw.com
FireMap.com
FlyCast.com
FoxKids.com
FoxLife.com
FoxPlay.com
FoxPlus.com
GenGirl.com
GenLine.com
GeneSea.com
GetSpin.com
GymKids.com
GymMail.com
HelpKey.com
HelpNet.com
HelpNow.com
HomeOwl.com
JetPlan.com
JobMesh.com
LabDrop.com
LabGold.com
LawNews.com
LifeMap.com
LiveFin.com
MPortal.com
MapTour.com
MedCars.com
MediSys.com
MindBio.com
MyScene.com
NFTFeed.com
NameCop.com
NanoLux.com
NeoWare.com
NetBook.com
NextApe.com
OurNews.com
OutTime.com
PayFlow.com
PetExpo.com
PetPath.com
PinkDog.com
PopBets.com
ProReal.com
ProTeam.com
RealBay.com
SeaPlay.com
SiteNow.com
SkiExpo.com
SkiTrip.com
SkiWear.com
SkySale.com
SoftMax.com
SunFace.com
SunFire.com
TalkNow.com
TaxEdge.com
TaxLife.com
TeleBay.com
TheFlip.com
TimeBio.com
TimePix.com
ToyShow.com
TrustIQ.com
UpCycle.com
UpWorks.com
VAction.com
VSecret.com
VitaJoy.com
WebCast.com
WebChat.com
WinGuru.com
WinTrip.com
WokInfo.com
WordDNA.com
WorkMap.com

AgileTax.com
AgriCard.com
AirTruth.com
AllBirds.com
AllGenes.com
AppCloud.com
AppStorm.com
BackDocs.com
BasePack.com
BattleTV.com
BetSmart.com
BetaFund.com
BikeBarn.com
BikeLine.com
BioMatic.com
BioWorld.com
BodyBlue.com
BodyShop.com
BoldLook.com
BuySight.com
ChatHelp.com
CheapFly.com
CitySeek.com
ClickTax.com
CodeGear.com
CodeGirl.com
ColorPro.com
CoolTown.com
CoolTrip.com
CoreCell.com
CropInfo.com
DNAStory.com
DailyHub.com
DairyDNA.com
DealTime.com
DevWorld.com
DocTimes.com
DogMovie.com
DriveWay.com
ECompany.com
EagleOne.com
EasyBags.com
EasyBank.com
EasyCars.com
EasyGold.com
EasyJobs.com
EmailPay.com
EtherBay.com
EvoLogic.com
FaceSpot.com
FairLoan.com
FairMail.com
FarmGear.com
FireRush.com
FixForce.com
FlowBank.com
FlowLook.com
FluxMesh.com
FoxWorld.com
FullMore.com
GameDrop.com
GearView.com
GiftHive.com
GoCourse.com
GoldCard.com
GoldSwan.com
GovCrush.com
GreyLock.com
HRCoding.com
HelloSum.com
HeyLight.com
HorseApp.com
HorseDNA.com
HydraAir.com
IVenture.com
IconPlus.com
InnoBook.com
InnoSure.com
InterMix.com
JobForce.com
JoyMaker.com
JuiceBox.com
LearnFit.com
LifeTech.com
LiveDots.com
LottoMax.com
LunaHelp.com
LunaSite.com
MCuisine.com
MailBear.com
MailKing.com
MailRank.com
MainSpot.com
MealDash.com
MedSmart.com
MediWell.com
MegaCars.com
MetaText.com
MintGift.com
MintLoan.com
MoneyNet.com
NameCops.com
NetSweet.com
NewScore.com
NewStorm.com
NewsCore.com
OpenRide.com
OpenTube.com
OurSpace.com
PayFirst.com
PetVille.com
PinkGlow.com
PlaySpot.com
PokerPay.com
PowerTax.com
ProClear.com
ProQuest.com
RawColor.com
ReEscrow.com
RockDrop.com
RockPort.com
SEOAlert.com
SafeSpot.com
SeaPilot.com
SeaScout.com
SearchHR.com
ShareBox.com
ShoeSite.com
SnapSpot.com
SnapTime.com
SoloSite.com
SunLotto.com
SwiftTax.com
TastyLab.com
TaxClick.com
TaxTalks.com
TaxVault.com
TaxWorks.com
TeaIndia.com
TechFeed.com
TeleShow.com
TheDaily.com
TheFight.com
TheStory.com
TimeLife.com
ToolMind.com
ToyMaker.com
TrueFirm.com
TrueHome.com
TwinLion.com
VAmerica.com
VCommand.com
VidaFeed.com
WeFamily.com
WeReview.com
WebBlock.com
WestHome.com
WestMail.com
WestNews.com
WinGuard.com
WinMania.com
WordWise.com
WorkDocs.com
WorkPlus.com
YogaGlow.com
YourDiet.com
I could answer those questions, but it would take a while. Most display creativity. Some do not.
 
1
•••
One does not simply trademark descriptive 'keyword' domains. Trademarks cannot be descriptive.

But trademarks are important in corporate warfare. Creates a defensible moat. So you look for catchy, short, trademark-able names. Maybe, made-up. Maybe, portmanteau. Maybe single letters!

Short, catchy names like X.com describe nothing and yet once you hear it you won't forget it. BUT short catchy names are fraught with fire swamps. Your brilliant idea has already been done. A lot. You need Musk level $$ to fight your way out. According to National Law Review, X.com was hit last year with the inevitable infringement suit. No idea how that turned out but X.com is still running so ...

Which brings us back to non trademark-able descriptive keyword domains. They are safe. They won't violate anyone's trademark. They are blue collar work horses. Folks can find you, no problem.

A good strategy for us peasants is to start our business on a low cost descriptive domain and gradually switch to a more 'spensive branded name as you get your money wheels and advertising going.

Maybe Musk should have gone with the drab sounding, beige colored ... SocialMedia.com

Both types of domains are needed. Trademark-able names have a much smaller market.
Disagree on "X". Quite identity-deprived. Also, when the value of TM's come up it is rarely considered that distinctiveness is not a TM regime invention. It is the function of a name. Since the dawn of names.
 
1
•••
Disagree on "X". Quite identity-deprived. Also, when the value of TM's come up it is rarely considered that distinctiveness is not a TM regime invention. It is the function of a name. Since the dawn of names.
I kinda get what you are saying in that names by function create distinctiveness. But you can't register a descriptive name as a trademark, for example if you make and sell dictionaries you can't use the word Dictionary as a trademark. However if you make and sell robots that translate foreign languages as they guide you through a foreign city you could use the term "Dictionary" as a trademark precisely because it isn't a dictionary. That example is in a bit of a grey area but would probably pass.

Am I just babbling like an idiot and not grokking what you were saying? Also X.com by it's extreme minimalist nature is imbued with the strong identity of its nearly supernatural minimalist vibe. Nothing in the domain realm surpasses its minimalism. Stark, yes. Even bleak. Like the monolith in the movie 2001, the brand identity is futuristic and domineering. Nothing says "I AM" like X.com
 
Last edited:
0
•••
I have a few made up names bought this year and live on Afternic and i must say that it's not all smokes and mirrors as it might seem,

There's a boom into new online startups and websites which are on the lookout for new Brandable names and it doesn't always have to be a dictionary word,

few of my names are <8 Letters, 2-3 syllables max and have gotten offers too which i declined cause it didn't line up with what i was looking for it,

But as an veteran once told me, you already have a good name when you know someone wants it for some $$$, and that should be considered a win in itself.

I would really suggest you to go through some guides out there which suggest how to compe up with made up names and you will be surprised too when you get your first offer for such a name, I hope you make it and keep going.... don't lose hope.
 
2
•••
People should start very diversified and not try to put too much of their portfolio into one line of thought. There is nothing wrong with trying to create a few brandables, but why not also pick up some keyword domains, some liquid domains, and different extensions, and see what works best for you? Sometimes we don't know where our talent lies until we experiment.

I play around with a few made-up brandables, but I have found that picking names where there are already several businesses using that name gives me better results. I tried longer domains, 3 and 4-word domains, and other extensions, but after reviewing the metrics for those niches, I decided there just was not any ROI there for me. I am not saying there is no money to be made there, but obviously, my skillset and line of thinking did not match up with success in those areas.

I keep a handful of names that I probably shouldn't, but my main focus is on names where I have a record of success. I am a hobbyist, but my net sales have exceeded my costs every year for over 20 years now with an average portfolio size of 250-400 and an average acquisition price under $30 per name. I have even quit domaining a couple of times and rebuilt my portfolio from scratch without losing, so I am not making money from domains I've held forever.

There are many models for success in this business, the key is finding the model that matches our aptitudes and our attitudes.
 
9
•••
People should start very diversified and not try to put too much of their portfolio into one line of thought. There is nothing wrong with trying to create a few brandables, but why not also pick up some keyword domains, some liquid domains, and different extensions, and see what works best for you? Sometimes we don't know where our talent lies until we experiment.

I play around with a few made-up brandables, but I have found that picking names where there are already several businesses using that name gives me better results. I tried longer domains, 3 and 4-word domains, and other extensions, but after reviewing the metrics for those niches, I decided there just was not any ROI there for me. I am not saying there is no money to be made there, but obviously, my skillset and line of thinking did not match up with success in those areas.

I keep a handful of names that I probably shouldn't, but my main focus is on names where I have a record of success. I am a hobbyist, but my net sales have exceeded my costs every year for over 20 years now with an average portfolio size of 250-400 and an average acquisition price under $30 per name. I have even quit domaining a couple of times and rebuilt my portfolio from scratch without losing, so I am not making money from domains I've held forever.

There are many models for success in this business, the key is finding the model that matches our aptitudes and our attitudes.

It is very nicely summed up here. I fully second. I do the same, just scaled-up version.
 
2
•••
Disagree on "X". Quite identity-deprived. Also, when the value of TM's come up it is rarely considered that distinctiveness is not a TM regime invention. It is the function of a name. Since the dawn of names.
On another note, it seems that some feel you're an exception in being able to come up with catchy names and that your results aren't replicable. What's your view?
 
0
•••
On another note, it seems that some feel you're an exception in being able to come up with catchy names and that your results aren't replicable. What's your view?
I have rethought my earlier answer about coming back to re-examine the list and explain what may be deemed 'Creative' You can pick the bones out of the concept but you can never fully dissect it.

Lets start with the major flaws for many when applied to Western values, that of education, culture, language, concepts, precepts . You can't escape them. One of the early lessons of working in merchandising was understanding what doesn't work. I never had to go there in display building purely because I could visualise the conflicts or negative elements. Am I looking for contrast and depth, Blend and transformation. Flow and direction.

Unlike art, your never working with a totally blank piece of canvas. Your word toolbox is massive but individual components sit in relationship with each other. Not dissimilar to a musical instrument. The skills are certainly transferrable.

Personal backgrounds are a key element in most conceptual ideals and models. My good fortune was starting off as a college trained French chef before moving into Retail Sales and then marketing and merchandising. I love creativity but you have to learn how to rule-out 99% of ideas from the beginning. Possibly move 1% to paper for refinement (That refinement stage is the real work)

I get quite a lot of ideas from other peoples, what I would call shots-in-the-dark, great idea totally unrefined.
 
Last edited:
3
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back