Holo vs VR vs MR vs AR vs any other reality (All realities)

[VRdommy]

Intel Project Alloy - A Must Read
http://www.pcworld.com/article/3108...first-open-source-third-party-vr-headset.html

The pace of change with new VR product designs is about to increase exponentially.
And while this is one thing to move that along, it's not the only thing.

...MORE...
http://www.trustedreviews.com/news/intel-project-alloy-vr-ar-merged-reality

 

[xr reality]

found tis in expired dumpster...
holo rep
holo gay

I leave holo gays for u if u wanna... hahaha

so yea dont really own holo adult so.loaded up..
and rep is abbreviation for many things... most common representative ... which makes total sense for holo... also short for repetition etc
... which I guess is why holoreps.com is fully developed holo based gym site or something.. reps.. repetitions..gym.
get it? hehe

Nice i picked up HoloBTC.com somebody dropped

 

[alcy]

Nice i picked up HoloBTC.com somebody dropped

that reminds me of hologrambitcoin and its plural... also expired ..2 day back... someone regged those too...I kinda passed on em

 

[NameFather]

Holo is more holistic. Also can be "HR".

Related Short Domains:
4xAR.com
HoloAspect.com
HoloAvant.com
HoloFull.com
HoloKeep.com
HoloMaven.com
HoloRaise.com

HiAR.xyz
ProAR.xyz

 

[alcy]

Holo is more holistic. Also can be "HR".

Related Short Domains:
4xAR.com
HoloAspect.com
HoloAvant.com
HoloFull.com
HoloKeep.com
HoloMaven.com
HoloRaise.com

HiAR.xyz
ProAR.xyz

maybe was before... holistic.. like vr was once more vacation rentals... etc... the point is that today and tomorrow and for past while basically all holo sales were holotech related.. developed or for resale..

 

[VRdommy]

And the suspense is not exactly killing but...
I suspected a stunt.

Quest 3 could steal the Apple VR headset’s thunder next week — why is no one talking about it?​

https://www.laptopmag.com/news/ques...nder-next-week-why-is-no-one-talking-about-it


As far as I know, they are not able to release Qust3 before AUG, but nothing stops them from announcing it.
After all, Apple is in the same boat. But I'm sure the dev's at WWDC brought a fat credit card to do a pre-order.

It's a shame that a lot of our future is hinged on the events about to unfold. One would easily think this would be broader before now. As long as it gets there I guess. Competition is good for all of us. There just does not seem to be much of it.
We now have a race for the hearts and minds of users. MORE GOODER LOL

 

[xr reality]

I have discussed that a few times here. Surprised you did not read.
But the skinny is, it's not Apple's TM, nor Patent.
It was some Chinese investors/TM attorney's trying to squat several TM's in advance of what they thought some were going to do.
Someone in the NON-MEDIA interpreted that as they wished to and the story was picked up by Bloomberg.
Conjecture built on conjecture, that started with a squat attempted theft.
But I know in advance, many will believe what they want to think about it, just the facts do not pan out that way.
But I have warned about it. Proceed with caution.

This will be an interesting read if apple goes xrOS as its operating system . Also deep dive llc is an apple shelf company also hold tm for other apple feature coming

 

[VRdommy]

Also deep dive llc is an apple shelf company also hold tm for other apple feature coming

You have relevant info or do I just have to guess ?

Let me guess... DEEP SCREEN
One more TM squat by the same co as XROS.

The mark was abandon in 2022 when they failed to file info on how the mark would be used and it expired.
Still have some active time left in some country's.
Apple would know better than this BS. To my knowledge, they have never had to resubmit missing info on a mark.

Anyone can apply for a TM that when tested, may not stand up.
We see this more often when the status is in application period. A chance for anyone to contest.
Then it must stand the scrutiny of specific protections that do not generically infringe before being granted. ie 'GLASS'
We seen 'Oculus' have many marks for different things non-conflicting.ie Oculus (light house lenses)

When you file, you must present exactly how the marks are used and what protections you are seeking in products or services. You also must have a real product to protect, not vaporware. You do not or ever own a word. You have protections of the use of that word for specific uses that must be in the application.
But some get granted and can not stand when contested in the real world via court.
You should endevor to look at the specifics of a NIKI TM. Many products or services that do not exist. But never contested. NIKI is a generic name for the God Of Victory.

Just be careful how much you jump or pump the gun on TM 'applications' Anyone can do it. And they have.

 

[mattG]

You have relevant info or do I just have to guess ?

Let me guess... DEEP SCREEN
One more TM squat by the same co as XROS.

The mark was abandon in 2022 when they failed to file info on how the mark would be used and it expired.
Still have some active time left in some country's.
Apple would know better than this BS. To my knowledge, they have never had to resubmit missing info on a mark.

Anyone can apply for a TM that when tested, may not stand up.
We see this more often when the status is in application period. A chance for anyone to contest.
Then it must stand the scrutiny of specific protections that do not generically infringe before being granted. ie 'GLASS'
We seen 'Oculus' have many marks for different things non-conflicting.ie Oculus (light house lenses)

When you file, you must present exactly how the marks are used and what protections you are seeking in products or services. You also must have a real product to protect, not vaporware. You do not or ever own a word. You have protections of the use of that word for specific uses that must be in the application.
But some get granted and can not stand when contested in the real world via court.
You should endevor to look at the specifics of a NIKI TM. Many products or services that do not exist. But never contested. NIKI is a generic name for the God Of Victory.

Just be careful how much you jump or pump the gun on TM 'applications' Anyone can do it. And they have.

Multiple reliable sources have reported on these TM filings as being tied to Apple. Just search ‘apple xros’ and no less than 2 dozen articles will pop. Whether or not they have actually settled on that name… well we’ll find out in a few days.

Also, the law firms that are behind some of these filings are legit and likely not the type to work for TM squatters.

Either way, these are exciting times for the entire space

 

[VRdommy]

xrize.com went for $265 in auctions yesterday, do you guys think it's brandable for XR? it went over my budget so i let it pass

You gave me an idea in XR names that may fruit ?

XRsize.fit &.fitness &.tips &.club

tnx
Sales outside of this niche have been alive and well. so are these a 2for ? ?
But not so bad inside the niche either. But all investors. I don't mind.
Perhaps this will change soon.

 

[VRdommy]

Multiple reliable sources have reported on these TM filings as being tied to Apple. Just search ‘apple xros’ and no less than 2 dozen articles will pop. Whether or not they have actually settled on that name… well we’ll find out in a few days.

Also, the law firms that are behind some of these filings are legit and likely not the type to work for TM squatters.

Either way, these are exciting times for the entire space

Reliable sources meaning Bloomberg reporting/printing on a rumor man's beliefs ?
They are not taking credit for the stories. They can point to him and they were just reporting what he said.
Everyone else is quoting Bloomberg.

 

[mattG]

Reliable sources meaning Bloomberg reporting/printing on a rumor man's beliefs ?

Did you google ‘apple xros’?

 

[VRdommy]

Did you google ‘apple xros’?

Not lately. I know all the tabloid blogs are on it. Based on the above. 'Bloomberg said it' ? LOL

 

[mattG]

Not lately. I know all the tabloid blogs are on it. Based on the above.

Regardless of what they name it, it does appear that Apple will introduce a headset and new OS on Monday. Assuming this does in fact happen, the tides could really shift fast for the entire space. Good stuff either way.

 

[VRdommy]

Regardless of what they name it, it does appear that Apple will introduce a headset and new OS on Monday. Assuming this does in fact happen, the tides could really shift fast for the entire space. Good stuff either way.

Yes,
If you have been following along and and watched 'what Apple has said'
They have been telling you all along what they are doing in their actions and in their name.
Apple Reality. (. Being that AR may have renewed double meaning ) That is a guess on my part.
Reality OS
I think I made a post about it 8 months ago and it was based on even older info from early 2022. But nobody cares to take the info from what Apple is actually doing under it's own name.

https://www.namepros.com/threads/ho...ty-all-realities.965879/page-302#post-8777818

And I have quite a few clues as to how good this device is. While it may be untouchable for many at the initial price, it is going to be 2-3 years ahead of everyone else. It will spark interest like we have never seen yet.
Thereby starting the whole industry.
I just don't see it accelerating much the first few years after launch. Need more competition. Perhaps Microsoft?
Apple will own it. Even though most can afford Meta Quest3.

 

[VRdommy]

Some more from the Apple rumor mill...
https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/30/23742631/apple-vr-ar-mixed-reality-headset-screens-displays-ppi

I would be disappointed if it did not have a least 4k per eye. But that pixel density is terrific if true. Likely is.

 

[xr reality]

Some more from the Apple rumor mill...
https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/30/23742631/apple-vr-ar-mixed-reality-headset-screens-displays-ppi

I would be disappointed if it did not have a least 4k per eye. But that pixel density is terrific if true. Likely is.

So to be clear you are saying xrOS will not be apple new operating system for its headset and the tm for deep dive ie xrOS are not apple tm shell company

 

[alcy]

small namebio sale
vrtime,,,com
round 1.5k

not much but make more fun morning news read than a.god damn newspaper and king Charlie and ukraina

 

[Elad n]

As it looks like XROS is going to be used (nothing certain but looks like it) I would ask @VRdommy and others.

What will xros usage by apple will do to the XR term.

 

[Kingslayer]

As it looks like XROS is going to be used (nothing certain but looks like it) I would ask @VRdommy and others.

What will xros usage by apple will do to the XR term.

Not a lot.

About 3 or 4 times a year for the last 8 years we always had these ‘big’ announcements from the likes of Apple/Facebook and other big tech companies that are ‘supposedly’ going to change things and are going and make usage terms be it Meta/Metaverse/Mixed Reality/Merged Reality/VR/AR/Immersive become relevant.

Truth is we still are where we was back in 2015 as far as naming is concerned, just search back and see the same conversations from almost a decade ago still happening today and my prediction is we will still be having this conversation this time next year on NamePros, ie 31st May 2024 there will be another upcoming announcement by a big tech company that (supposedly) is ‘going to change things’ as far as naming is concerned, maybe one day it will happen, but truth is out of (say) 20 of these ‘BIG’ announcements in the last few years, nothing has happened and we are still at square 1, so my money (I’m not putting any more of my money on it) is nothing happening again.

The biggest development in my time investing in virtual tech was the ‘meta’ and ‘metaverse’ boom during that 3 to 6 month spell a couple of years ago - I’ve never seen anything like that in my time investing and thought that was going to change things, but it never, would any investor pay more than $500 for a ‘meta+keyword’ domain today? If anyone would, bad investment in my opinion for various reasons.

 

[Elad n]

Not a lot.

About 3 or 4 times a year for the last 8 years we always had these ‘big’ announcements from the likes of Apple/Facebook and other big tech companies that are ‘supposedly’ going to change things and are going and make usage terms be it Meta/Metaverse/Mixed Reality/Merged Reality/VR/AR/Immersive become relevant.

Truth is we still are where we was back in 2015 as far as naming is concerned, just search back and see the same conversations from almost a decade ago still happening today and my prediction is we will still be having this conversation this time next year on NamePros, ie 31st May 2024 there will be another upcoming announcement by a big tech company that (supposedly) is ‘going to change things’ as far as naming is concerned, maybe one day it will happen, but truth is out of (say) 20 of these ‘BIG’ announcements in the last few years, nothing has happened and we are still at square 1, so my money (I’m not putting any more of my money on it) is nothing happening again.

The biggest development in my time investing in virtual tech was the ‘meta’ and ‘metaverse’ boom during that 3 to 6 month spell a couple of years ago - I’ve never seen anything like that in my time investing and thought that was going to change things, but it never, would any investor pay more than $500 for a ‘meta+keyword’ domain today? If anyone would, bad investment in my opinion for various reasons.

But some has become more relevant.

I still get offers for my metaverse names, and XR has gone stronger just this week I had 2 offers for for xrporn that are twice the amount i paid and i haven't really started negotiating (first offer)

Are you really seeing it the way you do saying nothing has changed?

 

[Kingslayer]

But some has become more relevant.

I still get offers for my metaverse names, and XR has gone stronger just this week I had 2 offers for for xrporn that are twice the amount i paid and i haven't really started negotiating (first offer)

Are you really seeing it the way you do saying nothing has changed?

I’m not bothered about people getting offers, I’m interested in 'sales' and how much companies are using a term and how much the public are using a term, but just for arguments sake I’m guessing these offers are from investors because ‘porn’ is one of top keywords and will be one of the biggest money makers in VR/AR and for the same reason why you bought it again, people are speculating in ‘hope’ XR becomes a thing.

Nothing has really changed as far as any set consumer term for VR/AR (something you a big believer in). Throughout the years on NamePros this catchphrase term has been Immersive/MR/XR/Metaverse and for some reason XR is being cheerlead again. There is no set term (universally accepted) to describe VR/AR and different companies still have their own ways in describing the tech in the same way they did many years ago, so no not a lot has changed.

I would bet this will still be the same 3 months from now, if there is a short-term boost in XR, be cautious (buying) but consider cashing out (if the price is good), there was a boost in 'meta' and 'metaverse' on the back of Facebook's 'Meta' annoucement and them hying 'the metaverse', look how thats gone.

Apple like to be unique and make something their own (not collectively used), so if they do hype something (XR?) don't be surprised if they try and own that and make it a term associated with Apple and if that happens, that is not good for domain investors.

 

[VRdommy]

So to be clear you are saying xrOS will not be apple new operating system for its headset and the tm for deep dive ie xrOS are not apple tm shell company

Obviously, you are not reading or understanding anything I have said for the last few years, so I'm not going to waste my time answering you directly with the same question over and over.
I will say that if you look back at the reporting from rumor, it was stated that Apple has reg'd by shell company before, but not this co. And it is not known if that was a squat they ended up paying for in place of litigation. All the info you need is out there. You just need to take the time to digest it. You don't find what you do not look for.
But you might as well just wait and see. Only a week.

Not a lot.

About 3 or 4 times a year for the last 8 years we always had these ‘big’ announcements from the likes of Apple/Facebook and other big tech companies that are ‘supposedly’ going to change things and are going and make usage terms be it Meta/Metaverse/Mixed Reality/Merged Reality/VR/AR/Immersive become relevant.

Truth is we still are where we was back in 2015 as far as naming is concerned, just search back and see the same conversations from almost a decade ago still happening today and my prediction is we will still be having this conversation this time next year on NamePros, ie 31st May 2024 there will be another upcoming announcement by a big tech company that (supposedly) is ‘going to change things’ as far as naming is concerned, maybe one day it will happen, but truth is out of (say) 20 of these ‘BIG’ announcements in the last few years, nothing has happened and we are still at square 1, so my money (I’m not putting any more of my money on it) is nothing happening again.

The biggest development in my time investing in virtual tech was the ‘meta’ and ‘metaverse’ boom during that 3 to 6 month spell a couple of years ago - I’ve never seen anything like that in my time investing and thought that was going to change things, but it never, would any investor pay more than $500 for a ‘meta+keyword’ domain today? If anyone would, bad investment in my opinion for various reasons.

I made good chunks of change with metaverse names. And they all went to investors.
I didn't mind as that was kinda the intended purpose. I knew it was going nowhere fast.
But the demand from investors would get the best of them. It just happened sooner than I thought.

Hey, someone was going to make a buck, it might as well be me. The money went to more meaningful investments that already made fruit, so I'm not looking back. Each were 4 figures.
Some might have made something in the wait, but the names were metaverse.gtld and some were pricey renewal.
I might hold one gtld now. There are none available.
I did not see it fully ripe for 5-8 more years and only for select names.. I think they call it cashflow.
They all sold under payment plans but one. So steady income for a year.and a half+.

Yes, sometimes I do play short because I know how people over-react, and even as I warn them so.

 

[Elad n]

I have made 75k selling Metaverse names to end users and about half of it selling XR names, most names to end users as well.
We all must live in different worlds.

@VRdommy , @xr reality has shown nothing but respect to you and your views even when he shouldn't have.
You should try to do the same as well.

Good luck to you all.

 

[VRdommy]

Looking past next weeks announcements, and to the future of what will be in the nearer term.

It's going to be the introduction of lots of new software. And lots of need for names for some.
This is the bulk of names need. Corporate ID and software names.

While I always stress caution, I would also stress to think outside of the box a bit.
For not all names needed are going to have our cherished keywords of VR AR MR and even XR.

Some know that I have been fond of the words holodeck and teleporter as well as 3d 4d etc.
You need to think how these applications needs will be used.
You need unique names. Not just ones that have the keywords that says it without doubt. Only a few choice names do it in a short way.

A company who markets VR golf and wants later to do this in AR/MR might choose XR if that is really a viable option in the future.
But they might also choose virtualgolf, 4dgolf, or 4dlynks or even foreDgolf. Think outside the box.

I'm just saying expand your horizons beyond the normal keywords.
A company will want a unique name that says what it's about and they can TM and protect.
And you still have to wait on demand to catch-up.
Just not enough dev's in the game yet. But time for choices is running short.
More money can be made in volume of selling names under 2.5k, so adjust your targets.
We all see the charts, and very few names make it to 5 figures+.
Most soffware expeditions are individuals, not some corporate giant.And there are few of those giants.

Yes, I am on a buying spree again to pick-up just that. My new complied short list has been brewing for 3 years now.
So, I didn't have to hold them that long as nobody is on it. But I'm ready now.

 

[xr reality]

Obviously, you are not reading or understanding anything I have said for the last few years, so I'm not going to waste my time answering you directly with the same question over and over.
I will say that if you look back at the reporting from rumor, it was stated that Apple has reg'd by shell company before, but not this co. And it is not known if that was a squat they ended up paying for in place of litigation. All the info you need is out there. You just need to take the time to digest it. You don't find what you do not look for.
But you might as well just wait and see. Only a week.

I made good chunks of change with metaverse names. And they all went to investors.
I didn't mind as that was kinda the intended purpose. I knew it was going nowhere fast.
But the demand from investors would get the best of them. It just happened sooner than I thought.

Hey, someone was going to make a buck, it might as well be me. The money went to more meaningful investments that already made fruit, so I'm not looking back. Each were 4 figures.
Some might have made something in the wait, but the names were metaverse.gtld and some were pricey renewal.
I might hold one gtld now. There are none available.
I did not see it fully ripe for 5-8 more years and only for select names.. I think they call it cashflow.
They all sold under payment plans but one. So steady income for a year.and a half+.

Yes, sometimes I do play short because I know how people over-react, and even as I warn them so.

Would love to hear what metaverse names you sold and how much as all information here helps us all setting our own prices from previous sales .

Looking forward to seeing the names your quote “ made a good chunk of change from “ so can help all here