- Impact
- 310
For years I read some people keep repeating the same mantra, like a verse from the Bible.
They kept saying that some letters are "premium" and some not. I call it BS, especially when there are so many different languages (for examples in Italian there are only 21 letters) and each language uses letters of their alphabet with different frequency.
You can do your own reasearch on Google:
www.google.com/search?q=frequency+of+letters+words+in+a+language
But the most annoying thing comes when native English speakers keep getting wrong the stats about their own language, especially by insisting that the letter U is not "premium".
It's incorrect, it has been years that we debated this, both in English and in other languages, if you really want to call some letters "PREMIUM", then the vowel U is there:
http://www.math.cornell.edu/~mec/2003-2004/cryptography/subs/frequencies.html
http://homepages.math.uic.edu/~leon/mcs425-s08/handouts/char_freq.pdf
Some people instead keep repeating forever what some guy from the 3chars website stated once. No matter how much evidence we throw at them about the letter U, they just repeat the same incorrect data.
Some people may argue with the following:
"the frequency of first letters of a word in the English language"
I won't add the source because Wikipedia is not a reliable source of data, please feel free to find and add better data, possibly from academic sources, thank you.
However, I can already note that "the first letter of an English word" stats do not consider that you are not selling dictionary words but often 4 letters which each stands for one word so we should gather data about how often the letters are used in 4L acronyms, like United Petroleom Texas Inc (name made up, not sure if it exists) or USPS.com
They kept saying that some letters are "premium" and some not. I call it BS, especially when there are so many different languages (for examples in Italian there are only 21 letters) and each language uses letters of their alphabet with different frequency.
You can do your own reasearch on Google:
www.google.com/search?q=frequency+of+letters+words+in+a+language
But the most annoying thing comes when native English speakers keep getting wrong the stats about their own language, especially by insisting that the letter U is not "premium".
It's incorrect, it has been years that we debated this, both in English and in other languages, if you really want to call some letters "PREMIUM", then the vowel U is there:
http://www.math.cornell.edu/~mec/2003-2004/cryptography/subs/frequencies.html
http://homepages.math.uic.edu/~leon/mcs425-s08/handouts/char_freq.pdf
Some people instead keep repeating forever what some guy from the 3chars website stated once. No matter how much evidence we throw at them about the letter U, they just repeat the same incorrect data.
Some people may argue with the following:
"the frequency of first letters of a word in the English language"
I won't add the source because Wikipedia is not a reliable source of data, please feel free to find and add better data, possibly from academic sources, thank you.
However, I can already note that "the first letter of an English word" stats do not consider that you are not selling dictionary words but often 4 letters which each stands for one word so we should gather data about how often the letters are used in 4L acronyms, like United Petroleom Texas Inc (name made up, not sure if it exists) or USPS.com
Last edited: