Chieff
Established Member
- Impact
- 87
I have suggestion that downvoting should be removed from forum
Downvoting facilitate mob mentality
Don't know why community like namepros still have it
Reasons:
1. It stops ppl from sharing different opinions
2. People don't want to see difference in opinion use downvote as a tool to pull down
Downvoting facilitate mob mentality
Don't know why community like namepros still have it
Reasons:
1. It stops ppl from sharing different opinions
2. People don't want to see difference in opinion use downvote as a tool to pull down
So, the biggest issue with anonymous downvoting is that it doesn't leave ANY room whatsoever for context UNLESS the downvote is paired with a written explanation of WHY it was given. There are "default upvoters and downvoters". Default upvoters and downvoters are likely the people who lean too heavily into the NamePros badge count and profile stats rather than the actual content itself after so long. I could say "water is wet" and there are people who will downvote this simple, and true, statement by default because of QUAD's history of being downvoted. However, if someone more decorated like say @bobhawkes says "water is dry" he'll likely get upvotes by default. Regardless of whether it's true or not. People will likely downvote this comment just because of that last sentence. Thank goodness Bob likely understands the reason for the example.
The Namepros upvote and downvote system is flawed to say the least. It's one of the platform's value-reducing elements. The lack of context allows a skewed narrative to be sculpted about a poster even if they're respectful, convey a sound perspective and keep the conversation going despite mob-like criticism and downvotes. Unfortunately, Namepros doesn't offer badges for resilient posters. If you dig into Quad's posting history you'll notice we've NEVER been rude or anything. We've planted seeds for healthy dialogue; but have been met with resistance when the Namepros status-quo is challenged. This makes Namepros feel more like a "club" than an "open-forum". Nevertheless, they have the power to run it as they please; and anyone who doesn't like it can scadaddle. Even those who lead with healthy dialogue. It's one heck of a dynamic; and definitely seems like narrative control.
Thank you so very much. Taking it all in stride has a lot to do with not wanting others to believe a downvote means you're wrong. There are likely tons of folks who stay on the sidelines of key discussions on this platform because they fear ridicule for having a point of view that's different despite being constructive. It's truly disheartening.
There are some people in life that are led by negativity; and it's reasonable to expect folks like this exist on the NamePros platform. It's not fair; nor is it right. However, it's the reality. The gravity of this reality can be heavier on some days more than others; but it never steers QUAD from being a voice of reason, fairness and respect. Thank you.
Mel
After realizing logic and positivity are downvoted here, and mods reserve the right to dismiss whomever they please for ANY reason, it became clear contributing to this particular forum isn't about the domain investing more than it's about keeping the idea that "what's good and respectful is resilient" alive. Yes, better was once expected from the platform's members; but now it's about being the CHANGE you wish to see. This is one reason QUAD continues to post here; while appreciating individuals like you.
