- Impact
- 1
Anyone have any news on this auction which is underway?
Jeff said:Let's get this nagging and very troubling question addressed (regarding the VERY PUBLIC mandated development requirements and their timely enforcement!) :yell:
If only you could reciprocate by stopping your slander of other members who have done nothing but purchase domains of their liking with their own money. It has been completely unprofessional of you to accuse members of hype, subterfuge and even the crime of being involved in a pyramid scheme simply for being involved in .mobi. It is something I would like a public apology from you for but I doubt I will ever see since you never acknowledge your own distortions and wrongdoing.Jeff said:Paul, thanks for the post ... I greatly appreciate the fact that in this post you didn't simply once again single-line ridicule and malign me and my opinions, but rather shared your thoughts in a professional, and more constructive, maner IMHO. :gl:
Exactly how have I misrepresented you or taken you out of context? You continue to deceive people and distort the truth by not acknowledging publicly the full range of things happening in the .mobi space. My comments are spot on.Jeff said:Although you've misrepresented or taken out of context some of my earlier or ongoing OPINIONS and core questions and concerns for both mTLD and the "dot Mobey", such as the "sales" of generic terms at Traffic (the subject here in this thread!), the development mandates and its firm, accepted deadline, the RFP process as it relates to generic terms, and lack of corporate adoptions of same, as well as the branding issue (to name a few)
Obviously you had no intention of changing your ways, the members here have answered your question to the best of their ability and yet your word is no good. No doubt you have some lame excuse for this, some technicality you will hide behind.Jeff said:"I will hereby refer to it as ".mobi" (or whatever you'd like me to call it) IF we can finally get all of the ANSWERS to these questions and concerns here in this space
Jeff, I've never denied any facts, just highlighted your ongoing fixation on a few things while you never acknowledge the full picture. When will you acknowledge the full picture? When will you stop claiming the RFP is dead when the HIGHLY VALUABLE single character domains are in the works to be released via RFP. Is not a single character domain generic? It seems to me it doesn't get more generic then that. When will you acknowledge all the work mTLD is doing to provide exceptional tools to their community for free or modest cost in the form of Dev.mobi, Ready.mobi, Site.mobi and Device Atlas? When are you going to recognize the Premium names that have been released via RFP or auction that are in fact developed? When are you going to recognize that corporations are in fact using AND promoting their .mobi domains to deliver mobile content?Jeff said:... but at least you've acknowledged the FACTS that "development requirements have not been adequately developed in the time alloted" and that "the coding requirements have not been specifically enforced to date",
Jeff said:and I believe also an admission that mTLD is sort of winging this thing as they go along ... "I look forward to a revised system ... ", which IMHO shouldn't even be a consideration (attempting to change the rules and agreements as they go along)!
In my honest opinion Jeff the greater accountability and credibility issue is with you. You continue to unrelentingly smear .mobi, mTLD and .mobi enthusiasts while rarely if ever acknowledging all the positive things that are going on in the .mobi space. This has completely eroded your credibility and it is crystal clear that here at NP you have ZERO accountability, free to continue with your onslaught unchecked. And sadly when your distortions are answered it is the responder who is blamed for derailing a thread. When privilege goes unchecked that is what happens. Emmeritus = Immunity.Jeff said:This is an ACCOUNTABILITY and CREDIBILITY issue with mTLD! :imho:
Jeff said:Again, thanks for more constructive post ... and once again, please:
Let's get this nagging and very troubling question addressed (regarding the VERY PUBLIC mandated development requirements and their timely enforcement!) :yell:
scandiman said:Yea, I know, we all know, your questions persist... no duh ... blah blah blah....
cosmik debris said:Still........the budgie squawks.
I rest my case for now...
... no duh ... blah blah blah....
None yet-Raja- said:Any Updates abt when the payments will be sent out? i had one sale, domain transferred and still waiting to hear from them.