- Impact
- 1,789
So, just saw this on twitter. Feel free to drop your opinions.
I would be focusing on Web5 development and domains in the finance area. Cash, money, credit, billing etc.Reckon the people that bought them are ready to buy web5 ones now?
Yeah, there is a big difference between companies in the "Web 3" field and those using "Web 3" in their domains.Web3... Only 30 sales on namebio. Not many recent ones either. So we're basically just pretending it's a trend at this point.
Show attachment 217743
I would replace the word important with "non-existent".It's a buzz word for an important niche.
VR,I would replace the word important with "non-existent".
It is an idea at this point. It if pans out, who knows.
If people want to buy domains in the field, be my guest, but it would be a good thing to look at other "trend" threads and how much money was wasted in them be if 3D, drones, weed, AI, crypto, web3, etc.
Brad
Every trend field generally has a limited amount of domains that are worthwhile. Many of those ones have been registered for a long time though when the trend actually starts to become popular.VR,
.mobi,
PWAs,
Libra,
Bitcoin,
.app,
Litecoin,
Meta,
.Xyz,
Stadia,
AR
I am still waiting for Jack Dorsey to build a company that actually turns a profit.If Jack Dorsey or Elon Musk say to jump from a cliff, will you follow his advice?
Obviously a large percent of all domains sales are not reported, likely a solid majority.So you think every sold domains is being reported on namebio. If ur stats is base on namebio data alone.. Then i understand your point. I have sold lots of names and for once i didnt submit on namebio likewise some domainers too. You are entitled to your opinion mate
"Web3" has 14,022 listed on Dan.com, and (30) total reported sales.I agree with what has already been said by @bmugford and others. The number of web5 domains listed on DAN has already risen to 3,532 in a short period of time. This should be more than enough for mankind. Most of these domains will remain for sale forever and eventually expire. Be very careful folks, especially newbies in our wonderful profession.
Show attachment 217746
I sold web3games.kingers in 5 figures and not reported.... Web5 is a great niche ! Like every niche only a good keyword sells..Web3... Only 30 sales on namebio. Not many recent ones either. So we're basically just pretending it's a trend at this point.
Show attachment 217743
Agreed. He's not exactly a visionaryI am still waiting for Jack Dorsey to build a company that actually turns a profit.
Sure, he has done well for himself but both Twitter and Square (Block) have an all time negative net income.
That means both of his major companies have lost more money than they have made, yet he is still a billionaire.
He is good at making money for himself, not others. Facts.
Brad
Why does that has to be so for web5 domains, but not for metaverse domains??Yeah, there is a big difference between companies in the "Web 3" field and those using "Web 3" in their domains.
It if becomes popular, it then becomes redundant to use as a term.
Brad
The vast majority of domain trends end the same way -As for sold web3 domains: Yeah, there is no need to use web3, as there is already metaverse as bigger buzz word.
Web5 however, is a keyword for its own niche.
That's the difference.
The owner of web4.com be like:
Yeah, once the web3 moves to the next one, that is my payday. Get paid 7-8 figures and retire...
Dorsey: people, we now announce web5...
Truth is, that you do not argue based on content.The vast majority of domain trends end the same way -
1.) There is some news.
2.) Domainers, but mainly noobs register a bunch of low quality domains.
3.) It is hyped up as the greatest thing ever.
4.) Very few sales are made.
5.) People move on to the next trend.
I will look forward to all the big Web5 sales. I won't be holding my breath though.
Brad
So just covering one blockchain is revolutionary but covering all is old hat?Web3 covers ALL coins, alt-coins, shit-coins, AND btc.
Web5 only covers bitcoin.
Yep.So just covering one blockchain is revolutionary but covering all is old hat?
People could just store their data on whatever medium they choose like with SOLID pods...Yep.
You have first to try & practice, before you can know for sure.
Alt-coins have been proved on how "better" or more innovative they are compared to btc,
but they always lacked when it comes to decentralization.
Having a coin that is fast in transfer, green in production, cheap in commission sacrifices the most important point:
decentralization.
Not saying there is no market for eth/sol etc.
There sincerely is, for ex. when it comes to NFTs aso.
But if you want it to be 100% decentralized, nowadays there is only btc.
(maybe coins like monero could immitate it, but I am sceptical).
Nope.People could just store their data on whatever medium they choose like with SOLID pods...