For those high premium renewal domains I think its strategy is tend to focus on companies that won't think spending on it is a big deal, in registry's thought, it is likely reserved in best scenario for famous companies to adopt them for promotional purpose.Sure it's not a bad strategy for the people that control .xyz if people are stupid enough to pay a premium to acquire on of these domains and then pay a premium every year on top of that too to keep it, but it's not a wise investment to brand around Car dot xyz, an extension not even top 5 and unpredictable renewal fees.
People know this, hence Car dot xyz low price and will no doubt keep selling for around that price ($10k and under).
He says that end user sales and reseller prices are far apart and then you began an inane ramble about premium renewals.What's so hard for you to understand?
because that's the reason causing it happened the different scenario with .us he mentioned, can't you just be a little bit forward thinking?He says that end user sales and reseller prices are far apart and then you began an inane ramble about premium renewals.
Can't you be a scintilla less rude?because that's the reason causing it happened the different scenario with .us he mentioned, can't you just be a little bit forward thinking?
This is an eye-opening perspective on what extensions tech companies are going with, I went through the first 1500 and only found 12 with xyz. The data doesn't reflect what a lot of articles keep saying about xyz being the fan favorite for tech, metaverse, crypto etc. Thanks for sharing.Seems like more crypto sites are using .network, .io or .finance than xyz from what I've been seeing
Eg https://golden.com/query/list-of-cryptocurrency-companies-E5Y
xyz is meant to be famous on web3
Well, I considered it's an eye-closing perspective.This is an eye-opening perspective on what extensions tech companies are going with, I went through the first 1500 and only found 12 with xyz. The data doesn't reflect what a lot of articles keep saying about xyz being the fan favorite for tech, metaverse, crypto etc. Thanks for sharing.
Hipushing the extension using this argument is nonsense.
seems you don't understand what gives a domain extension value. The global adoption rate of an domain extension is from its reputation, you could say that the function of all domain names are the same, but a large value derived from its image, .com is famous because it issued earlier and carried with good meaning(company, commercial etc.) nothing more, HNS allows you to create a domain extension does that mean the fame of the extension itself depends on adopters's own promotion? This largely limits its potential in value, which is an adverse condition to domainers, I am not saying HNS is bad, on the contrary I think HNS is a good project but as an investor's point of view it just needed to wait longer.I noticed people bringing up this argument a lot. I fail to see how .XYZ would give a company a significant advantage in web3.
Let's cut the crap. Web 3 has absolutely nothing to do with domain extensions. It's about the tech behind it and the way it works.
Now... there are obviously handshake extensions, pretty cool, but XYZ is no part of that.
When the time comes the layman will generally accept (let alone understand the concept of) web3, getting in on the decentralised web, they will prefer what's familiar to them. That's .com, ccTLD.
They're all just tlds, like XYZ. Technically not a single difference. So again, how does that make XYZ web3? It's just a narrative pushed by a certain crowd ignoring facts and reality.
Web3 enthusiasts and related companies may like the extension, don't mind adopting it, but ultimately: pushing the extension using this argument is nonsense.
seems you don't understand what gives a domain extension value. The global adoption rate of an domain extension is from its reputation, you could say that the function of all domain names are the same, but a large value derived from its image, .com is famous because it issued earlier and carried with good meaning(company, commercial etc.) nothing more, HNS allows you to create a domain extension does that mean the fame of the extension itself depends on adopters's own promotion? This largely limits its potential in value, which is an adverse condition to domainers, I am not saying HNS is bad, on the contrary I think HNS is a good project but as an investor's point of view it just needed to wait longer.
Since you brought up the topic we're talking about web3 domain name so of course xyz is part of the web3 members as I explained above so must to give some contexts, you just don't get my point do you? My point is xyz could even be better than native blockchain domain names if it can be resolved by many BNS.All this and additional posts are a perfect example of what issue I'm raising about people bringing web3/chain/dec into the discussion when we're talking about .xyz.
My point is, xyz isn't hns/web3 so the argument oftentimes raised is nonsense.
Do niche related companies use and like the tld? Yes. Would they still prefer .com/cctld? Most definitely.
I always thought xyz domains are a marketing front to attract GEN X, Y, Z??Since you brought up the topic we're talking about web3 domain name so of course xyz is part of the web3 members as I explained above so must to give some context, you just don't get my point do you? My point is xyz could even be better than native blockchain domain names if it can be resolved by many BNS.
You mean like block.xyz?I always thought xyz domains are a marketing front to attract GEN X, Y, Z??
I have not seen ANY cryptocurrency using xyz. Some might...but not the major players.
lol block.xyz is not a cryptocurrency. Do some research before you throw blockchain related terms to prove a point.You mean like block.xyz?
Ok, my bad and actually I realized that earlier, Xyz wasn't popular during the cryptocurrency launch boom and that doesn't affect xyz gaining places in web3 niche.lol block.xyz is not a cryptocurrency. Do some research before you throw blockchain related terms to prove a point.
Since you brought up the topic we're talking about web3 domain name so of course xyz is part of the web3 members as I explained above so must to give some contexts, you just don't get my point do you? My point is xyz could even be better than native blockchain domain names if it can be resolved by many BNS.
You are just a hater.Show attachment 214538
So much Bollo*cks being spoke about this extension it's unreal.......someone's doing well with it...great......move on and do your own thing, but the constant ass kissing and lack of critical thought is a joke......
Question anything about it and you are classed as a troll
*I hold several .xyz domains and have sold one 1 this year, so nothing personal against the extension but the people pumping and promoting it are doing more harm than good......
Can you display results that show what you mean/backup.. by ".com is the worst" Folks here and I believe anywhere will have a hard time digesting this. ThanksI like .abc more than .xyz
But .com is the worst.
What's interesting is that the OP started a thread with a clickbait title, included a screenshot with zero context, & did not participate in the thread..
hmmm...
IMO